I'm going to assume the 1874 Creedmoor as listed is pretty close to the max 12.2 lbs. having a barrel of (.875 at muzzle to 1.125 at receiver) and 30".
First I'm wondering if that would be considered a standard round barrrel? Given that it is. If I were to make this an 1877 rifle which, from what I've heard, has a receiver almost a lb lighter, how much heavier of a barrel? size? would one would be able get?
1874 vs 1877 weight
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:59 pm
- Location: Highlands Ranch, Colorado
-
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:33 pm
Re: 1874 vs 1877 weight
My advice is contact Shiloh
-
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 8:04 am
- Location: Fuckoffstan, Wyoming
Re: 1874 vs 1877 weight
[quote="ChrisF"]My advice is contact Shiloh[/quote]
Shiloh Rifle Forums
Support
Ask Shiloh questions about your Shiloh Sharps Rifle.
Shiloh Rifle Forums
Support
Ask Shiloh questions about your Shiloh Sharps Rifle.
-
- Posts: 1253
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 7:47 am
- Location: Casper, Wyoming
Re: 1874 vs 1877 weight
If you want specific information, you should call Shiloh.
I don't think anyone spends all day monitoring this forum waiting for you questions.
Bryan
I don't think anyone spends all day monitoring this forum waiting for you questions.
Bryan
“I wonder if God created man because He was disappointed with the monkey.” Mark Twain
-
- Posts: 2179
- Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 7:38 pm
- Location: Hill Country, TX
Re: 1874 vs 1877 weight
Pink Panther,
I wouldn't put much credence in your assumption. A barrel with those dimensions would likely result in a rifle weight closer to 10 lb. A #1 Sporter with heavy barrel, 1.125" at the breach and 1" at the muzzle weighs close to 10 lb.; with standard barrel, it probably weighs 10 to 10.5 lb. IIRC, the Creedmore has a round barrel, making it even lighter in comparison to the octagonal barrel of the #1.
Remember, too, that the differences in wood density can make weight vary by up to 0.5 lb. I had one #1 Sporter heavy octagon that weighed right at 12 lb. 2-1/2 oz. with sights; my current #1 with heavy 1/2 octagon weighs 11 lb. 6 oz.
The folks at Shiloh can give you a more accurate idea.
Clarence
I wouldn't put much credence in your assumption. A barrel with those dimensions would likely result in a rifle weight closer to 10 lb. A #1 Sporter with heavy barrel, 1.125" at the breach and 1" at the muzzle weighs close to 10 lb.; with standard barrel, it probably weighs 10 to 10.5 lb. IIRC, the Creedmore has a round barrel, making it even lighter in comparison to the octagonal barrel of the #1.
Remember, too, that the differences in wood density can make weight vary by up to 0.5 lb. I had one #1 Sporter heavy octagon that weighed right at 12 lb. 2-1/2 oz. with sights; my current #1 with heavy 1/2 octagon weighs 11 lb. 6 oz.
The folks at Shiloh can give you a more accurate idea.
Clarence
- Lumpy Grits
- Posts: 7680
- Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 7:58 pm
- Location: Springfield, Missouri-U.S.A. Earth
Re: 1874 vs 1877 weight
Your caliber will also affect barrel weight.
Call Shiloh.......
Gary
Call Shiloh.......
Gary
"Hav'n you along, is like loose'n two good men"
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:16 pm
Re: 1874 vs 1877 weight
In one of the Black Powder Cartridge News articles from a while ago someone wrote a bit about this. From what I remember, based on wood density, it's possible for an 1877 with a 32" .40-65 heavy barrel can make silhouette weight. It probably depends a lot on options chosen and wood density. I had two C. Sharps highwalls with identical looking wood and one was 1/2 pound heavier than the other.
Chris.
Chris.